Back to overview
Battle Card

Noreja vs. mpmX Comparison

mpmX from German vendor MEHRWERK is tightly interwoven with Qlik technology, reliably resolves complex n:m relationships, and works in-memory for highly interactive analysis. This comparison shows the technological distinction: mpmX builds on an associative BI engine and remains frequency-based in its process analysis. Noreja, by contrast, relies on a dedicated, graph-based causal and temporal model, thereby separating genuine causes from statistical coincidence.

Comparison at a Glance

CriterionNorejampmX
Analysis paradigmCausal + TemporalFrequency-based
Data modelEvent Knowledge GraphRelational model (n:m), in-memory
Ecosystem lock-inLowHigh
Causal analysisNativeNo
Pricing transparencyTransparent, publicOn request

About mpmX

mpmX from German vendor MEHRWERK is tightly interwoven with Qlik technology and combines classic BI, reporting, and self-service process mining on one platform. The associative analysis approach enables flexible, interactive evaluations and a fast start for BI-savvy teams.

Strengths

  • Reliably resolves complex n:m relationships between process objects
  • In-memory processing for performant, highly interactive analysis
  • Associative analytics via the Qlik engine, combined with BI and reporting
  • Fast onboarding and self-service for data-savvy departments

Methodical context

  • Analytical strength is tied to the underlying Qlik technology foundation
  • Process analysis remains frequency-based without causal modeling
  • No graph-based, semantic causal model at its core

Why Noreja instead of mpmX?

Noreja relies on a dedicated, graph-based causal and temporal model instead of a frequency analysis built on top of BI technology – thereby separating genuine causes from statistical coincidence.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Noreja an alternative to mpmX (MEHRWERK)?

Yes. Both address process mining, but Noreja relies on a graph-based causal model instead of a frequency-based analysis built on Qlik.

Do I need Qlik to use Noreja?

No. Noreja brings its own graph and analysis infrastructure. mpmX, on the other hand, is tied to the Qlik technology foundation.

How does Noreja handle n:m relationships?

Noreja represents n:m relationships natively in the Event Knowledge Graph and augments them with causal and temporal links – beyond relational resolution alone.

More comparisons

Experience Causal Process Analysis Yourself

See how Noreja analyzes processes causally on an Event Knowledge Graph – beyond frequency-based Directly-Follows models.